On this page
Read Concern "local"
A query with read concern "local"
returns data from the instance with no guarantee that the data has been written to a majority of the replica set members (i.e. may be rolled back).
Read concern "local"
is the default for:
- read operations against primary
- read operations against secondaries if the reads are associated with causally consistent sessions.
Regardless of the read concern level, the most recent data on a node may not reflect the most recent version of the data in the system.
Causally Consistent Sessions
Read concern local
is available for use with causally consistent sessions.
Example
Consider the following timeline of a write operation Write0 to a three member replica set:
Note
For simplification, the example assumes:
- All writes prior to Write0 have been successfully replicated to all members.
- Writeprev is the previous write before Write0.
- No other writes have occured after Write0.
Time | Event | Most Recent Write | Most Recent w: “majority” write |
---|---|---|---|
t0 | Primary applies Write0 |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
Primary: Write prev
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t1 | Secondary1 applies write0 |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
Primary: Write prev
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t2 | Secondary2 applies write0 |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Primary: Write prev
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t3 | Primary is aware of successful replication to Secondary1 and sends acknowledgement to client |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t4 | Primary is aware of successful replication to Secondary2 |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write prev
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t5 | Secondary1 receives notice (through regular replication mechanism) to update its snapshot of its most recent w: “majority” write |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write prev
|
t6 | Secondary2 receives notice (through regular replication mechanism) to update its snapshot of its most recent w: “majority” write |
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Primary: Write 0
Secondary 1: Write 0
Secondary 2: Write 0
|
Then, the following tables summarizes the state of the data that a read operation with "local"
read concern would see at time T
.
Read Target | Time T |
State of Data |
---|---|---|
Primary | After t0 | Data reflects Write0. |
Secondary1 | Before t1 | Data reflects Writeprev |
Secondary1 | After t1 | Data reflects Write0 |
Secondary2 | Before t2 | Data reflects Writeprev |
Secondary2 | After t2 | Data reflects Write0 |